Showing posts sorted by relevance for query meaning. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query meaning. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, December 19, 2022

Don't skip it

We human beings look for the meaning of things; we want to understand and know the truth. The search for meaning is a feature built into our very nature by our Creator. 

But yes, it's possible as a human being to deny meaning and transcendence, to insist that there's nothing beyond the material. That's what atheism teaches.

Re-post from six years ago:

Atheists have a new billboard campaign for the season. Their theme is "Make Christmas great again. Skip church!"

So I wonder how this works. Was Christmas great in the past when God was no part of it? If we all skip church, will Christmas be great again? But there's never been a time when the season was empty of God. Since the beginning, its central core has been the birth of Jesus Christ on earth.

photo: mine

I'm glad if atheists can enjoy decorations and traditions. But the joy of Christmas would not last if God were taken out of the season. Eventually nothing would be left but cynical materialism.

There are lots of  cynics who don't have a merry celebration. The good will and beauty of Christmas are just cloying if there's no meaning in it. 

Monday, July 29, 2013

What is evolution?

The word is often used, and its meaning can be pretty fuzzy.

First there is the general meaning which no one argues about:  just change over time.  In this sense, you evolve as you learn and experience life; your job evolves as you add or subtract responsibilities.  Change occurs in almost everything as time goes on.

Then there is micro-evolution, which no one argues about:  all life species change somewhat in relatively minor ways.  The size of a bird species' beak can change with changing circumstances, for instance, so that most of the birds in an environment have stronger/bigger beaks when the seeds available to eat become tougher.  An apple is developed by horticulturists that is sweeter and juicier than others.

photo:  mrjacksfarm.com

But it's the third type that does get argued about:  macro-evolution.  This theory says that changes in a kind of animal/plant happen over generations to the point that the later animal/plant is actually a different kind than its ancestors were, and all the kinds of life on earth came about this way.

There are lots of implications to this meaning of evolution.


Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Meaning 1

Science can tell us about the structure of planets, plants and animals, and about the physical laws that direct their behavior. But it's silent about why they exist. 

We human beings look for the meaning of things. We want to understand and know the truth.  We're looking for the reason behind the facts. All of us routinely ask "why?" Scientist Albert Einstein himself asked why the universe is the way it is and couldn't answer that question.

Dr. John Lennox likes to use his example of a tea pot. Science can tell us the facts about H2O molecules, the temperature at which water boils, how long it will take, and more.  But only he can tell us why he's heating water. The answer is: he wants a cup of tea.

Some materialists would like us to agree with them that there's no purpose or meaning to reality, just the brute scientific facts: "[T]here is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.

But people are not wired that way. We all know there is more.

(cont'd tomorrow)

Monday, February 25, 2013

Good wealth


Millions of dollars of inherited wealth spent recklessly ("Millionaire Image"):  maybe you would say this is bad wealth.  Millions of dollars earned, but through unethical behavior like lying to or cheating other people:   almost everyone would call this bad wealth (the perpetrator would just call it survival of the fittest).

But that is not the common kind of wealth.  It's much more common that good wealth is earned by well-meaning people who are trying to build something ("Creating . . Wealth") for their family and their employees.

It's good wealth when it's earned by providing a service or a product that others need/want at a price that they figure is a good deal for them (it's also good when you make your wealth by working for such a business).

"What we now know is that market economies work because they allow wealth to be created", says Jay Richards in his book Money, Greed, and God.

People all over the world use their abilities and resources to support their families by creating wealth with the help of "micro loans" that help them start or grow their businesses.  They are well-meaning people who are trying to provide material wealth for their families.

One of their stories:

"Jacqueline became the sole provider for her family after her husband, a soldier, was killed. " (See the rest of her story, and several others, here)

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Macro-evolution

(cont'd)

Survey after survey shows that Americans largely do not believe that last meaning of  "evolution" is correct. But public (government) schools, from elementary to university level,  uniformly teach that it is correct.

Both public schools and government are committed to avoid supporting any view whatsoever that involves God, so their options are severely limited.  There's only one theory about the origin of life that doesn't involve God at all, and that is evolution (see the third meaning of this word, macro-evolution, in yesterday's post).

Here's how it works.  Offspring retain the characteristics of their parents almost entirely, but random small variations can occur.  Among all the offspring, if an individual has an advantageous variation, then that individual may have more offspring bearing the inherited advantage. Over time, the species evolves in that direction, resulting in new life forms.

It's called natural selection.  The individuals in every generation who survive to reproduce were the most fit to survive and reproduce.  Nobody disagrees with this!

There is only disagreement with the claim that this process alone produced all life's diversity:  whales, spiders, palm trees, cats, tulips, dinosaurs, butterflies, wolves, roses, salmon, worms, moss,  etc., etc.

photo:  statedclearly.com

Friday, March 22, 2024

Happy 1

Are Americans happy? It's a big-scale question that the United Nations analyzes periodically. According to their report published this week, we as a people are a lot less happy than we used to be. In just a year we dropped from 15th happiest country in the world to 23rd happiest. 

That's a big drop in a short time. This week's report specifies generations for the first time, so the reason for it can be identified: young people (ages 10-29) are deeply unhappy, and they pull down our average.

Well, we know how they've been educated for years and that may have something to do with it. Human beings are not made happy when we're told that we're alone in the universe, that there's no God and no ultimate justice, no transcendent meaning to life, that we're nothing but more-evolved animals, etc.

Happiness is not trivial, as long as we don't define it with a shallow meaning. For our purposes on this blog, we're using the term as life satisfaction, peace of mind, a sense of well-being. For several weeks we're going to explore the subject every Friday. There is hope.

Have a good weekend! 

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Perpetuating

Economist Dambisa Moyo, originally from Zambia, says that aid from the West to developing countries in Africa has become a self-perpetuating industry. "Glamour Aid" promoted by celebrities has strayed so far from its well-meaning intent that it actually brings harm to today's African people.



It should be noted that she's talking about huge government-to-government payments (not humanitarian aid in crises). She says only about 20% of that aid actually makes it through government hands down to the country's people.

(cont'd tomorrow)

Monday, October 19, 2020

Existence

God's existence cannot be mathematically or scientifically proved. But neither can it be proved that He does not exist, no matter what any dogmatic atheist would like to claim. Both beliefs are a matter of choice based on evidence that a person thinks important.

People have been making that choice one way or another throughout history. The debate continues.

Here is an argument that is new to me, hinging on the meaning of "contingent." It was explained by mathematician and natural philosopher Gottfried Leibniz at the end of the 17th century. 

Friday, July 10, 2026

Welcome, world!

So much energy, so much passion is happening during the World Cup hosted in the US this summer! It's been thrilling to see global visitors have fun here, and to hear many say they felt a warm, friendly welcome. Somebody produced an awesome song about it.

Scots celebrated their Scottish-ness, Norwegians their Viking-ness; as the song below says, "Flags from every nation waving proud and on display!" We loved it. Only a small minority of us stick up their noses (meaning) at people who love their own country. Do I love America, too? I sure do. 

Our visitors liked things I wouldn't have expected, like Walmart and Costco and Buc-ee's, things in our day-to-day ordinary life and . . American food, another surprise. Media portrayal of America did not lead them to expect overall abundance in our way of life. I'm glad they came.

Enjoy 😄

Thursday, December 22, 2016

"Skip church!"

Atheists have a new billboard campaign for the season. Their theme is "Make Christmas great again. Skip church!"

So I wonder how this works. Was Christmas great in the past when God was no part of it? If we all skip church, will Christmas be great again? But there's never been a time when the season was empty of God. Since the beginning, its central core has been the birth of Jesus Christ on earth.

photo: mine

I'm glad if atheists can enjoy decorations and traditions. But the joy of Christmas would not last if God were taken out of the season. Eventually nothing would be left but cynical materialism.

There are lots of  cynics who don't have a merry celebration. The good will and beauty of Christmas are just cloying if there's no meaning in it. 

(cont'd tomorrow)

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Meaning of the Gosnell trial

Bioethicist and physician Leon Kass "fears that American society risks becoming disrespectful of dignity and indifferent to degradation."  He believes in a "deep moral intuition" that recognizes evil.


"A funny thing happened to me in graduate school," he recalls. "My wife and I spent part of the summer of 1965 in Mississippi doing civil-rights work." The couple lived with a black farmer in Mount Olive, Miss., in a home that had no toilet or indoor plumbing. "I came back from this place with this conundrum: Why was there more honor, goodness and decency in these unschooled black farmers than I found in my fellow graduate students at Harvard, whose enlightened and liberal opinions I shared?"
"The answer, he eventually concluded, was that his black hosts displayed "the dignity of honest work and religion"—things he didn't often find among his highly educated peers, most of whom "were only looking out for Number One." Around the same time, Dr. Kass's reading of Rousseau, C.S. Lewis's "The Abolition of Man" (1943) and "Brave New World" (1931) . . led him to see that as science advances, morals don't necessarily improve; that the opposite might well be the case."
He sees the problem stemming from "scientism . . a quasi-religious faith that scientific knowledge is the only knowledge worthy of the name; that scientific knowledge gives you an exhaustive account of the way things are; and that science will transcend all the limitations of our human condition, all of our miseries." 
His view is that transcendent qualities like love and honor arise from outside the material world.  In contrast  to scientism, or materialism, this means that science is not sufficient to explain all of reality.  It's a biblical view (he's Jewish).

Monday, August 30, 2021

Mindless 2

 (cont'd from last Friday)

Dr. Lennox explains "narrow" artificial intelligence (AI) with this practical example of its application in health care.

A person with a diseased lung goes to a doctor for a diagnosis. An x-ray of the lung is taken; the doctor looks at it and compares the x-ray to his/her memories of articles and other x-rays he/she has seen. Using his/her memory and knowledge, a diagnosis is made.

Or . . the patient's x-ray is fed into an AI system which compares it to the million lung x-rays of other patients stored in it. It looks for patterns, and a diagnosis is made without delay.

Which method is faster and more accurate? Probably the AI method, provided that correct information and meaning of the x-rays has been programmed into it by wise doctors.

Narrow AI usually does just a single thing which normally would have required natural (human) intelligence. But it doesn't know what it's doing. It is simply programmed to do a methodical task using a large amount of input. 

(cont'd tomorrow)

Friday, December 23, 2016

Lux Venit

(cont'd meaning of Christmas from yesterday's post)

Built into us by the Creator is a longing to understand God and eternity, to believe there is really hope for humanity:

"By sword, by flame
In death solemn ages passed,
And voices young grow old & weary
Holding fast - hope for the dawning"

The appeal of the Christian good news is that God sought out humanity by sending Jesus Christ to reveal Him, to be Light for us:

"Lux venit - Arise, shine! For your light has come!"

Those lyrics are from the song below. It's years old, but "Lux Venit" from this album by Michael W. Smith moves me every time I hear it. So enjoy . .

Friday, May 1, 2026

This weekend?

Have some free time this weekend? There's a movie I can recommend to you, The Story of Everything, a beautifully made film that explores a universal question: did a supernatural Intelligence make the world, or was it all a big accident? Is there any evidence in nature that there's a design, a mind behind it all?

It's based on the book, Return of the God Hypothesis. Author Stephen Meyer started asking if anything in his life really mattered--as a 14-year-old. Yes, teenagers do wonder about life's meaning. 

Even if science is not your thing, it's not just about you anymore. People in your life, like your kids and grandkids, are deeply affected by the public opinions of scientists. Maybe they'd like to see some information and a view of the world which they never learned in public school.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

AI believer cont'd

Google wanted Kurzweil because of his undeniable expertise in artificial intelligence and his vision for where AI should go and how to get there.  


He invented the voice-to-print program and he's still focused on language.  He thinks language is the key to creating intelligent machines that go beyond pattern recognition and computation to meaning itself, predicting computers that can joke and flirt.

But public opinion generally has serious misgivings about machines evolving super intelligence and the consciousness to use it.  You could name the movies with this theme: "Terminator,"  "Transcendence," and more.

As AI develops there have been attempts to stay ahead of the curve, to anticipate problems, to limit the consequences to good results rather than the possible-and-all-too-obvious bad results that could also happen.  

A British attempt to keep ethics in the equation is the subject tomorrow.

Friday, September 1, 2023

Unit of life 4

(cont'd from yesterday's post)

Evolution, change over time in living organisms, is driven by random variation (random gene mutations) and "natural selection," meaning that good mutations spread when individuals with that mutation have a survival advantage. 

But gene mutations don't typically install new, beneficial features. Genetic mutations may help the species adapt to its environment, but not by giving it new updates--like a new generation phone with updated features.

"In short, helpful mutations don't install new features-- they are not a DNA upgrade." They don't add a new functions that create higher forms of life.

Friday, July 5, 2024

Declaration 2

(cont'd from yesterday's post)

Yesterday's video with actors reciting the Declaration of Independence was well done, unsurprisingly. 

But the language might be challenging, probably requiring a little work to follow. So I had AI re-write it in modern language. AI did a good job--except it eliminated references to God.

A second time I had AI re-write it in modern language, this time specifically using the word "God." In the interest of helping all of us grasp the meaning of our founding document, here it is (though it makes for a very long post):


In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, that they are endowed by God with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. He has endeavored to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations here, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers. He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent here swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance. He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States: For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury: For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences: For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighboring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies: For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to God for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of God, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.



Tuesday, May 20, 2014

iPad team leader

Following Christ infuses meaning into all of life - your daily work too.  He does not leave you while you see to your job responsibilities.

Joshua Banko is a guy who seems to have no sacred-secular divide regarding his work.  At a conference last winter, "Joshua talked about how God is the first and the Greatest Creator. How He has endowed mankind—made in His image—with the capacity to create and innovate. This powerful gift enables us to imagine and craft entirely new things, whether music, poetry, furniture, houses, cars, or iPads.



Photo:  apple.com

"God is glorified as we use our creativity to fashion things that reflect His beauty and are beneficial to others in obedience to Christ’s command to love our neighbor. . .

"What makes Joshua’s story even more compelling is that his former workplace, Apple Computers, Inc., is in the heart of the highly secularized Silicon Valley, where he worked for many years leading the team that developed the iPad."

Monday, June 2, 2014

Addiction psychiatry

Dr. Christian Thurstone does research on addiction & adolescent psychiatry in Colorado.  Go to his website for data on marijuana use

"Simply put, this website offers information about child mental health — particularly as it relates to substance use, abuse and addiction.
"We’re big believers in evidence-based medicine that has practical, real-world applications — meaning science that has been subjected to the rigorous review of reputable scholars and can be used at home and throughout a community.
"That doesn’t mean we have all the answers — but it does mean the information you find here is trustworthy enough to guide your search for them responsibly."

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

NK escape 1

Yeonmi Park was a child in North Korea, where she learned early that to speak was fraught with danger. Any talk that crossed the government's narrative could result in prison camp or execution for you and generations of your family. Even someone who seems friendly with you would have to report it, so don't trust anyone.

There is no word for friend. They use the word "comrade," meaning someone you work with for the "glory of the party." There is no word for love, except in the sense that you must love the "Dear Leader." They were taught that they lived in a socialist paradise.

Vocabulary control is thought control. Another tool for controlling thought is plain old hunger. Weak and desperate citizens who worry about every meal have little thought to spare for political change. Starving North Koreans are taught that former leader Kim Jong Un died of exhaustion working for the good of the people.

In 2007 her family could no longer find food. Yeonmi had never seen a map of the world, but saw lights across the border to China. That looked better to her, and that's where the family went.

from Epoch Times

(cont'd tomorrow)