Are AI platforms or their owning companies responsible if they produce terrible outcomes? The Starbuck suit (yesterday's post) against Google may help define this question. But it's not the only lawsuit trying to hold AI accountable.
A 16-year-old boy committed suicide last year, and his family is suing Open AI for wrongful death.
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
Robby's effectiveness in changing corporate minds about DEI caught the attention of the NYT, which did a story on "how to handle the Robby Starbuck problem in corporate America." Large sums of money were spent on "oppo" research to find something negative that could be used as leverage against him.
More seriously, Google's AI started accusing him of very bad things when a search on his name was done. Most of us routinely believe answers from artificial intelligence, right? So, these accusations were injected into public opinion and were a direct threat to his reputation.
But the accusations (child rapist, financial cheater, convicted of sexual assault, etc.) were all made up by AI and completely untrue. When asked to verify these charges, Google's AI invented both fake police reports and fake articles written by real journalists. That is, it made up both the lie and the documentation of it.
Google's AI (Gemini), when questioned, "admitted that it was deliberately engineered to damage the reputation of individuals with whom Google executives disagree politically, including Mr. Starbuck."
Robby filed a lawsuit against Google last January. Google's response is that their AI was just hallucinating, and they've done nothing to fix it.
Bret Weinstein makes some chilling remarks about the danger of AI misleading its readers and ruining people's reputations at about 4:45 and following in video below.
Robby Starbuck's family lost everything when communism took over in Cuba, so they fled to the United States. As the son of immigrants, he absorbed their vivid memories of growing tyranny in their homeland and the relief of finding freedom in the US. He learned to be alert to early signs that tyranny could threaten our American values . . because if America falls, there's no place to run to.
Producing Hollywood films was his career goal. While pursuing it in California, he ditched that goal to do something more meaningful to him: he saw this country going the wrong way and decided to put all his effort into getting it back on track.
Corporations went political a few years back. Ideas like DEI racism and transgenderism found their way into boardrooms of big corporations and into their policies. When Robby tried to change executives' policies, they would ask him, "ok what organization must I donate to in order to get you off my case?" They seemed to respect it when he refused that money. He's had success with Target and others. A committed, woke activist who was head of Harley Davidson (motorcycles) could not be persuaded to change, and he is now gone.
Robby wants to fight for what he believes to be right, and he's been effective. He's also paid a price for being in the public eye.
Elements of Earth's natural order, like spiders and our water system, are wonderful when you know more about them. But the whole system is wonderful in itself. Natural elements are balanced for a healthy ecosystem.
Beavers were a traditional, natural element of the landscape of Scotland. Then they completely disappeared due to over-hunting . .
Until this century. They're back after going extinct 400 years ago. In only 15 years, their resumed presence in the landscape made welcome and wonderful changes to Scotland's rivers. Flooding declined. Clarity improved and wildlife returned. Droughts were less destructive.
"Beavers re-built the living fabric of the river."
More: dam-building is instinctual. If the sound of running water is played in a dry environment, a beaver will pile sticks on it. Where does instinct come from? Maybe an algorithm built into the brain.
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
Even common water is a wonder, when you know more about it.
Water is known to be an essential element of the planetary environment which can sustain life. One of the most common substances on earth, it's simple: two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.
But its properties are rare:
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
Different species of spiders make webs of special kinds: collars, trapdoors, tunnels, as well as the familiar net design. But exactly how do they know which kinds of proteins to combine that will give the web its flexibility, its legendary strength, its stickiness? And where to put the anchor points? Spiders don't make conscious choices relating to biochemistry, geometry, engineering.
Instinct is not an answer. It's a way of saying "we don't know." A credible path to evolutionary development of the biological web-building system would require every necessary gene mutation on that pathway to render a survival advantage of some kind (natural selection). A biologist and spider specialist says it may be impossible to figure it out.
Complex functions and behaviors like this bear a strong resemblance to a human engineering project, a very intentional and rational activity that involves mathematical and chemical formulas.
Maybe science will someday discover algorithms that are somehow built into the genome. Coded information doesn't come from random material causes. But it would be consistent with the Creator God hypothesis.
from Evolution News
All around us is the natural world. We're rightfully busy with our demanding responsibilities, but occasionally we have time and opportunity to pay attention to the natural wonders of our world. It's refreshing to notice some of the common but wonderful things.
With all the advances of today's amazing science and technology, you'd think we could have reproduced something as simple and ubiquitous as spider silk. But no, it still hasn't(?) been done.
Voter fraud was not invented during our own time.
In American elections of the 19th century, fraud took the form of "cooping," a clumsy but effective way to cheat with paper ballots. In fact, it seems that a famous writer and poet of the time was involved.
Then, as now, the goal was to multiply votes for the favored candidate. Intoxicated people in bars were held in a central location (a "coop") and forced, in their drunken condition, to repeatedly vote. After each trip to the ballot box, they would be dressed in different clothes or otherwise disguised--to obscure their identity--and sent back to vote again.
Edgar Allen Poe, sadly, suffered from alcoholism and depression. Four days before his death, he was found distressed and disoriented near a voting site in Baltimore. He was not wearing his own clothes. He seems to have been a "cooping" victim (image).
Human corruption continues in our own time. Many oppose a precaution as simple and wholesome as showing identification (ID) when voting. Even people of good will can be deceived into voting against common sense.
from Mind Matters
Two years ago, over half of Argentina's population lived in poverty. Today that's been cut in half. In just two years the poverty rate dropped from 54% to 28%.
President Milei has held office since December of 2023, a little over two years ago--the same two years. How has Milei accomplished this tremendous turn-around?
As a former economist, he understood something important: socialism produces poverty. His country had been under socialism for almost a century. Part of his strategy has been to reduce the size of the government. State subsidies along with public sector payrolls were slashed.
Inflation declined from 200% when he took office to 33% two months ago. For the first time in about a century, Argentina had a fiscal surplus in 2025.
A chainsaw is the symbol of his attack on overspending and socialism.
from Washington Post
(cont'd tomorrow)
Note: hang in there with me for just one more Artemis-themed post 😉
One day after their return from the moon, NASA Chief Jared introduced the astronauts like this, "Artemis crew, this moment is the result of years of hard work, absolutely immense expertise, and just being all around great human beings."
First of the astronauts to speak was Commander Reid Wiseman: "Twenty-four hours ago the earth was this big [arms apart], we were doing Mach 39, and now we're home! We are bonded forever. No one down here is ever going to know just what we went through."
Pilot Victor Glover: "When this started on April 3, I wanted to thank God in public, and I want to thank God again . . for seeing what we saw, for doing what we did, for who I was with. We are fortunate to be in this agency at this time, together. Thank you also to our Air Operations."
Mission Specialist Christina Koch: "What struck me was not just this little Earth but all the blackness around it. Earth was just this lifeboat hanging un-disturbingly in the universe." She called Earth and its people a "crew," which she described as "beautifully and dutifully linked."
Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen: "The science is there with the things we've learned, and it's incredible. But it's the human experience that is extraordinary for us. I don't think people will ever fully comprehend how well supported and trained we were. There was a lot of joy up there."
It's the dream of a lifetime for NASA's new administrator, Jared Isaacson.
He knows his life arc is unusual: "You should not be able to drop out of high school at 16, start a company, and wind up an astronaut leading NASA someday. It's why we live in the greatest nation in the world."
Now that he's smack in the middle of America's space industry (image), what does he dream about for our future in space?
A US base on the Moon, of course, comes first. Helium mining on the Moon. Within a decade, there'll be dozens of flights into space in a year instead of just one every few years. Many international space stations will handle civilian visitors. Space Reactor 1-Freedom, the first-ever nuclear-powered interplanetary spaceship, will go to Mars in Dec. 2028 where it will drop off 3 unmanned space helicopters to go exploring. Our first astronauts will go to Mars in ten years.
Do his dreams sound starry-eyed? He thinks we can change the world.
from The Free Press
NASA, America and most of the world joyfully welcomed the astronauts safely back to their home planet last Friday evening. I joined with many who thanked God for their safe return.
Artemis II was a stunning success for NASA, achieving precise goals per that wonderful descriptor, "Nominal." The term means: as planned, right on target, just as it should be. (Splashdown is at 3:40 in video.)
Pilot Victor Glover did the last message before they went behind the dark side of the Moon: "As we prepare to go out of radio communication, we're still going to feel your love from Earth. And to all of you down there on Earth and around Earth, we love you, from the Moon. We will see you on the other side."
It was a relief to resume communication with them as they completed their 6 hours on the dark side. Mission Specialist Cristina Koch shared aspirational words as they came back in view of Earth:
“We will explore. We will build ships. We will visit again. We will build scientific outposts, drive rovers, do radio astronomy and found companies. We will strengthen industry and inspire. But ultimately, we will always choose Earth. We will always choose each other.”
Note: If you were intrigued by "A Great Awakening," here's an interview with the young star
Enormous, failed projects are found in multiple countries, including North Korea.
How big is their tourist industry, do you think? The better question probably is: who would want to go there?! I'm guessing the answer is: very few.
Yet North Korea set out to create the biggest hotel in the world for the prestige. The 105-story concrete shell has been there for decades but was never finished. It's starting to crumble. There is a bright facade on which political messages are played.
But the Hotel of Doom has never had a single guest.
Years ago, I discovered China's urbanizing drive, their "ghost cities," and their empty towns: staggering amounts of money were invested to develop them, yet almost no one lived there.
Years later, and they haven't changed much. (Here's a recent update on Kangbashi.)
Other countries have their stories of enormous expenditure, followed by emptiness or failure. Check out the gorgeous, expensive Forest City of Malaysia--empty and eerie for the few who do go there:
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
America does not ignore the poor who can't afford housing, food, medical care, etc. A huge 51% of our annual federal spending goes to entitlements. But those benefits are not counted in the poverty statistics you saw yesterday for some reason.
That's the first important point of yesterday's video: the actual percentage of people in the US who lack basic needs is about 3%, not 10-18%. (That means 23 million to 60 million fewer people in the US live that way.) Though their earned income is under the poverty point, government payments lift their lifestyle out of poverty.
We don't want millions of our fellow citizens to lack the necessities, so we're happy to help. That's the motivation behind the American "safety net."
Unfortunately, there's an unintended consequence of the welfare system, explained very well in yesterday's video. A significant number of people content themselves with dependence rather than using their lives productively. Surprisingly, that includes about 7 million men of working age. Not good for America--devastating for those men.
How could America, one of the richest countries in the world, tolerate a crisis of poverty? Claims are published that ~10 to 17.8% of our people are suffering in dire poverty.
If you hear something like this, you have to wonder why the government doesn't lend a hand. But wait, different levels of government have lots of ways to help. If vast numbers of people are barely surviving, why don't they sign up for food stamps? It's confusing.
What do the numbers mean?
Follow up to this post
On Saturday, my husband and I brought friends along and saw that movie I recommended to you last week, "A Great Awakening."
As expected, the acting, photography, dialog, music, all the production values were good. In fact, it was so good that I hope many of you will choose to see it.
The story is based on true facts. Ben Franklin was savvy enough in business to take advantage of a trend he saw developing. Though apparently not a Christian, he could see the potential of publishing the schedule and sermons of popular evangelist George Whitefield.
Whitefield represents the message of the Bible very well: Jesus Christ paid the whole price to reconcile us to God. We're not required to clean ourselves up first, but just to trust Him.
Did Franklin eventually turn to God? Maybe. Late in life, at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, he made a famous appeal to the delegates that could have come from Whitefield's influence--and possibly turned around the contentious convention.
At the top of NASA's list of core values is safety.
If safety were the only core value, they could achieve it best by staying out of space. Space is inherently dangerous. But their purpose is to explore space. None of their missions are risk-free. Safety is what they try to achieve in the context of danger.
Taking Artemis 2 astronauts through space in a small life-sustaining room is the task of their spacecraft, Orion.
What's outside? Just the harshest environment humans have ever faced: "extreme radiation, massive temperature swings, and deep space vacuum."
After some delays, Artemis 2 launched yesterday. Four astronauts are on their way. Following a swing around Earth, tonight they will break orbit and head for the Moon. (Note: the path of Orion turned out to be a bit different from what's shown in the video below.)
Orion is the crewed spacecraft which will take them there. It launched from Cape Canaveral on the SLS (Space Launch System) rocket. This is only the second mission for Orion. It flew without crew back in 2022 on the mission Artemis 1, that mission which confirmed for NASA that we now have a reliable deep-space transportation system.
But Orion has no landing ability. Landing on the Moon is planned for Artemis 4, which will take place at least two years from now.
Have you heard that it's more exciting to be a glamorous young woman than a married young woman starting a family? Some received that message and kept chasing that vision--until it was too late to realistically expect the other vision to come true, the vision of motherhood.
That particular window of opportunity has an expiration date. The author of this article says she thinks she's past the window and she regrets it.
If statistical data would be convincing to a young woman who wonders which is the happier path, she should consider this: "married mothers ages 22-35 are nearly three times likelier to report being "very happy" than their single childless peers (41% vs 14%)."
"If you find the right person in your 20's, don't hesitate. Commit. Build the life that actually fills the soul."
Personally: so glad I did.
Two movie recommendations in one week? I've never done that before. But here's another one that may be worth seeing: "Project Hail Mary." You could take a family to it, though maybe not younger kids. You'll see a cross-species friendship in the context of space and science.
An average man, not a hero of any sort, wakes up in a spaceship, alone and confused, very far from planet Earth. Long flashbacks inform us of what he's doing there. He eventually knows he's on a critical mission against his wishes--as the one hope for the survival of all humanity on Earth. You could call the mission a "hail Mary" because this hope is a long shot.
Opening this very week is a movie that you should be aware of if you, like me, are attracted to meaningful, dramatic history. A partnership was created between the most amazingly talented preacher in colonial America -- and the famously brilliant but skeptical Ben Franklin.
Call it an unlikely partnership, and open to interpretation. In the words (movie words) of evangelist George Whitefield, it was "A match made in Heaven!" In the words of Ben Franklin, it could be called "A deal made in a print shop."
I'm recommending "A Great Awakening" (sight-unseen) and looking forward to it.
Drought has fallen on Nebraska ranchers, a serious threat to property and to incomes. Wildfires naturally followed drought and destroyed thousands of acres of hay recently, spelling disaster for cattle.
Winds of 70 mph blowing across the flat terrain resulted in a record-breaking 827,000 acres burned this month.
"One rancher related that they were able to save some cattle by herding them into a field that had a pivot irrigation sprinkler system that they turned on. The water kept the cattle drenched and safe as the fire swept past." A consolation for this rancher, but just a partial one. They still have to be fed somehow, and the range is burned up.
Organizations like Nebraska Cattlemen Disaster Relief Fund will help. But quicker relief may come from neighbors who informally organize to help their neighbors:
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
Part of Hector's admiration for America, he says, is because he studied the historical record and compared outcomes among nations:
He loves the First Amendment (image): "It assumes that human beings will disagree deeply--and refuses to grant the state authority to referee truth." What an important insight: governments consist of flawed people, the only kind there is. People can only be free where they are not forced to speak the government's "truth," where they can speak their consciences.
"America is not great because it is easy. It is great because it trusts its people with freedom [per Pres. John Kennedy] and demands that they be worthy of it. I can only hope to be."
* For more on this responsibility, read If You Can Keep It by Eric Metaxas
from Substack
Hector Herrera and his wife recently sat in the US consulate in Montreal, watching the other soon-to-be citizens with their laps full of folders and documents, all quietly waiting for their chosen identity to become fully legal. Many were dressed up. It's a grave, important moment.
He began life in Mexico, lived in Canada, and will soon make his home in the US. He's lived with different assumptions about responsibility, speech, the role of the state. He sorted out what he thinks is right . . and made a reasoned decision to become an American citizen.
People are allowed here to try, to fail, to try and fail again, and eventually learn how to succeed. "It builds grit. It builds anti-fragility. It builds citizens who are not waiting to be rescued."
"Over the past decade," he says, "I have slowly transformed into an Americanist."
What does he mean by that? How did America earn his respect?
from Substack
(cont'd tomorrow)
Follow up to this post
Last fall's political protest rioting in Nepal was violent and chaotic, and led by young people. The government fell - and what was their new solution? They weren't sure where to go from there.
But someone is always ready to step into the vacuum when old power fails.
Early this month there was an election that turned into a landslide. Did they vote for an expert in governance? For someone old and experienced? Nope. A 35-year-old hero of Gen Z who used to rap for a living is set to be the new prime minister. Well, ok, he's also a politician because he was the mayor of the capital, Kathmandu.
(Was it only the young who wanted change? No, an 84-year-old voter had the same hope: "This time we need new faces, not the same old people who do nothing.")
Sounds like the point of all this is that the next generation of young Nepalese who care about their country were determined to kick out the old, corrupt elites. I hope they can make their way toward sound and responsible government.
from NYT
Our bodies were designed on purpose by their vastly intelligent Creator in my opinion. Is that just faith, as materialists would claim? Yes, it is faith because it can't be proved--but there's awesome evidence to draw me to this conclusion, and I love to put some of that on this blog for you.
(If you want more: an award-winning engineer's analysis of the human knee)
(cont'd from yesterday's post)
Johns Hopkins University says that most of the foods we eat--75% of the US food supply and over half the average adult's calories--are ultra-processed. That includes common foods like lunch meats, chips, boxed meals, instant oatmeal, energy drinks. “Many of these ultra-processed foods are intentionally designed by the food industry to be irresistible to consumers . . ." And they succeed. (How hard is it to eat just one chip?)
For the sake of our health, federal nutrition standards have been updated under the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The message they want us to hear is simple: "Eat real food." There's a new food pyramid in town:
The colorful, bold new website? Built by National Design Studio, of course.
from Eat Real Food
Yummy fast food is so appealing that it's a "go-to" when we need a quick meal which everyone in the family will like. Americans eat more fast food on average than people of any other country. We also buy highly or ultra processed food at other places, including grocery stores, when we need that quick meal.
But do we make that choice for excellent nutrition? Nope. Ultra/highly processed foods (photo) or fast foods are convenient, but no one thinks they're the healthiest choice. We need something easy because we have hectic schedules, or because no one at home can cook.
So, what should we eat instead? Our current federal government has taken a stand in favor of "Real Food," saying "highly processed food has hollowed out our health, driving obesity, diabetes, heart disease and early death."
In that case, what should we eat for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
from Eat Real Food
(cont'd tomorrow)
