When a WSJ writer made a video called "The Dark Art of Political Intimidation," Youtube lost no time in providing a good example of that intimidation by censoring and taking down the video.
As you watch it, look for sexual indecency or violence. Since there is none of that, what did Youtube object to? Apparently, they object to decent and reasoned free expression of views when it comes from a source they don't like.
This one was restored (after Wall Street Journal called them out) but seventeen other videos are still censored.
No comments:
Post a Comment